Teams

Miami-Dade/Cabane

2022 Miami-Dade Combo 18 & Over - Night · 9.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.88 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-27vs Cabane2 (Trump Doral)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRamon Hudec / Javier Martinez vs Mario Porcelli / Sebastian MartinezChristensen3-6, 5-7
2022-07-19vs Cabane2 (Trump Doral)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRamon Hudec / RICARDO GIRON vs Alejandro Lataczewski / Sebastian MartinezChristensen6-2, 6-2
2022-07-07vs Cabane2 (Trump Doral)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRICARDO GIRON / Antonio Necuze vs Alejandro Lataczewski / Sebastian MartinezChristensen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEduardo Castillob / Javier Martinez vs Carlos Manuel Parra-Alvarez / SEBASTIAN COVOS6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEduardo Cabrita / Ramon Hudec vs Mario Porcelli / Alejandro Aller6-1, 6-2
2022-07-03vs Cabane2 (Trump Doral)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRamon Hudec / RICARDO GIRON vs Mario Porcelli / SEBASTIAN COVOS6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJavier Martinez / Eduardo Cabrita vs Alejandro Lataczewski / Sebastian MartinezChristensen6-1, 6-2
2022-06-26vs Cabane2 (Trump Doral)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRamon Hudec / Eduardo Castillob vs Mario Porcelli / Sebastian MartinezChristensen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJavier Martinez / Eduardo Cabrita vs Alejandro Aller / Alejandro Lataczewski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAntonio Necuze / RICARDO GIRON vs SEBASTIAN COVOS / Carlos Manuel Parra-Alvarez6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.01
Eduardo Cabrita
published 5
4.36
RICARDO GIRON
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Antonio Necuze
published 5
4.20
Javier Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.19
Ramon Hudec
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ricardo Matos Casas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramon Hudec + Javier Martinez2442% gamesnot enough data
Ramon Hudec + RICARDO GIRON303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Eduardo Castillob
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
5.01
5
Eduardo Cabrita
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
RICARDO GIRON
151W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
5
Antonio Necuze
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
4.31
Javier Martinez
71W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
Ramon Hudec
125W–88L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
Ricardo Matos Casas
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.