Teams

CGuinn/MOhaus (Charlotte Tennis NC)

2024 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 6.5 Women - Fri AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-11vs SJohnson (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Guinn / Melodie Ohaus vs Karen Bowman / Nanette Murphy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-20vs LO'Shea/Stover (Southampton)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Slep / Carol Guinn vs Denise Bost / Lisa O'Shea2-6, 2-6
2024-09-06vs SJohnson (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGillian Murrell / Wilma Pinter vs Celia Stallings / Gayle Gold3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-30vs LO'Shea/Stover (Southampton)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell vs Susie McCraney / Barbara Anne Romero3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJoan Slep / Maureen Genser vs Janet Janda / Susan Stover6-4, 6-3
2024-08-16vs SJohnson (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesWilma Pinter / Gillian Murrell vs Cyndie Hobson / Kathy Aitken4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-09vs LO'Shea/Stover (Southampton)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatty Kahle / Gillian Murrell vs Lisa O'Shea / Denise Bost6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoan Slep / Maureen Genser vs Susie McCraney / Barbara Anne Romero5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 6.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Karen Trigg
published
3.01
Kate Blankenship
published
2.99
Patty Kahle
published
2.95
Joan Slep
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Gillian Murrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Jane Bond
published
2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Dianne Petrosino
published 3
2.55
Maureen Genser
published
2.51
Kay Dugan
published
2.38
Carol Guinn
published 3
Patty Halvorsen
published
Wilma Pinter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Murrell + Joan Slep8550% games−7.9% vs expected
Dianne Petrosino + Wilma Pinter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Trigg
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kate Blankenship
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Patty Kahle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Joan Slep
50W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Gillian Murrell
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
Jane Bond
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dianne Petrosino
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Maureen Genser
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.55
Kay Dugan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Carol Guinn
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.38
Patty Halvorsen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wilma Pinter
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.