Teams

Ltc - Sokolov

2021 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.0 ADULT 18 & OVER MEN

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-08Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMark Blum / Dennis Docil vs Jose Ramirez / Michael Delaney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Hoaglin / Phil Sokolov vs Douglas Kerl / Christian Reyes3-6, 2-6
2021-05-25vs Piccolo - Sanchez/AlizoLost 03
L#1 DoublesHerman Samson / William Hoaglin vs Stanley Tsung / RAUL SANCHEZ DOMINGUEZ2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLuis Zolezzi vs Ignacio Sarria6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Blum / Mario Rueda vs Roberto Nieves / Rafael Oropeza3-6, 0-6
2021-05-18vs Jetc - CundyWon 20
W#2 DoublesSilvio da Silva / Mario Rueda vs Paul Muldoon / Edward Bianchi6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLuis Zolezzi vs David Perrin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFrank Rosso / William Hoaglin vs Peter Ratzan / Jeffrey Sturman5-7, 3-6
2021-05-04vs Parkland - Les/MikeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHerman Samson / William Hoaglin vs Eli Panell / David Williams3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMario Rueda / Silvio da Silva vs Diego Velasquez / Adalberto Taguchi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-27vs Broward - Ltc/RSauermanLost 02
L#1 SinglesLuis Zolezzi vs Eliu Montero6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Delao / Dennis Docil vs Marcus Pfenninger / Dave McLaren3-6, 3-6
2021-04-20vs Wtc - SassonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hoaglin / Frank Rosso vs Alejandro Matheus / Matt Olender7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMario Rueda vs Charles Gould6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 ADULT 18 & OVER MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Luis Zolezzi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
David Chalich
published 4
Dennis Docil
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Herman Samson
published 4
3.67
Frank Rosso
published 4
3.65
Silvio da Silva
published
3.61
Steve Martinez
published
3.58
William Hoaglin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.55
Mario Rueda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Mark Blum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mario Rueda + Luis Zolezzi3351% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Docil + Luis Zolezzi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Zolezzi
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
David Chalich
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Dennis Docil
26W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Herman Samson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Frank Rosso
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Silvio da Silva
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Steve Martinez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
William Hoaglin
63W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Mario Rueda
25W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
Mark Blum
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.