Teams

JClough-DFC

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-24vs GDichter-CHTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMatt Piland vs Sravan Narayan1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTodd Resly vs Matthew Anderson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJeffrey Clough vs Scott Benson6-0, 6-0
2026-06-17vs JByrd-NCCULost 03
L#1 SinglesMatt Piland vs Brett Eckles2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Clough vs Nicolas Quevedo1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRod Snyder vs Aaron Yip2-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs SLlewellyn-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEric Pollak vs Tyler Carroll6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKrishna Vallabhaneni vs Spencer Llewellyn1-6, 6-7
2026-06-03vs JLundberg-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesEric Pollak vs Zack Czajkowski3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Clough vs Luc Sanchez6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRod Snyder vs Michael Weslander0-6, 4-6
2026-05-27vs JByrd-NCCUSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKrishna Vallabhaneni vs Brett Eckles4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTodd Resly vs Aaron Yip6-3, 6-4
2026-05-20vs MHanauer-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesEric Pollak vs Matthew Hanauer6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEdmund Malesky vs Christopher Green7-5, 6-1
2026-05-13vs GDichter-CHTCSplit 11
L#2 SinglesEdmund Malesky vs Reed Breneman6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMatt Piland vs Alexis Maklakoff6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-06vs SLlewellyn-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesTodd Resly vs Kelvin Menezes4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesKrishna Vallabhaneni vs Ryan Sayko2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRod Snyder vs Spencer Llewellyn1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Todd Resly
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.30
Eric Pollak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.14
Krishna Vallabhaneni
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.08
Jeffrey Clough
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
4.06
Matt Piland
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
4.06
Edmund Malesky
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.94
Rod Snyder
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Resly
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
Eric Pollak
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Krishna Vallabhaneni
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
Jeffrey Clough
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.08
Matt Piland
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
Edmund Malesky
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
4.06
Rod Snyder
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.