Teams

LLFO-Foreman/Peninsula Club

2025 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-07vs LABO-Bogojevich/CSD SPARTANSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Wixom / Louis Foreman vs Keith Harris / Dan Reinhart6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Robinson / Alan Rummelsburg vs Dewey Baker / Todd Larsen0-6, 6-7
2025-04-30vs LSDA-Dagley/ WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Chris Wixom vs Shawn Dagley / George Simonetti6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Borders / Alan Rummelsburg vs David Turek / Peter Norelli6-2, 6-0
2025-04-23vs LNDA-Daly/RRCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Chris Wixom vs Newell Daly / Geoffrey Allen6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Shaughnessy / James Borders vs Stephen Noe / Bill Worsley7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Rummelsburg / Jim Beam vs Carson Anderson / Todd Simmel6-2, 6-0
2025-04-19vs LRAG-Age/PeninsulaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Chris Wixom vs Thomas Larson / Robert Ageenko6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Confoy / Jim Beam vs Richard Dandurand / Clarence Bush7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBryan Shaughnessy / James Borders vs Tom Waber / Walter Hubbard3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-16vs LJFR- Franck/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Chris Wixom vs Sly Riccardelli / Steve Cada6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Robinson / Alan Rummelsburg vs Jason Schoenrock / Paul Childers6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Confoy / Bryan Shaughnessy vs Michael Kemper / Jeffrey Buaron6-3, 6-1
2025-04-02vs LABO-Bogojevich/CSD SPARTANLost 02
L#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Alan Rummelsburg vs Hyo Rhee / Paul Thompson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Beam / Kevin Confoy vs Dewey Baker / Andrew Backus1-6, 3-6
2025-03-26vs LSDA-Dagley/ WestportSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Wixom / Louis Foreman vs Jonathan Aberle / Andrew Orr6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBryan Shaughnessy / Alan Rummelsburg vs David Turek / Andrew Strevell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-19vs LNDA-Daly/RRCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Chris Wixom vs Thomas Noyes / Mark Russell6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBryan Shaughnessy / Jim Beam vs Bill Worsley / Todd Simmel6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-12vs LJFR- Franck/WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Wixom / Alan Rummelsburg vs Steve Cada / Paul Childers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLouis Foreman / Artemas Holmes vs Joe Franck / Michael Kemper6-2, 6-4
2025-03-05vs LRAG-Age/PeninsulaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Chris Wixom vs Douglas Matheson / Brent King6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesArtemas Holmes / Alan Rummelsburg vs Richard Dandurand / Thomas Larson1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Confoy / James Borders vs Tom Waber / Walter Hubbard6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Chris Wixom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Louis Foreman
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.39
Marc Lelong
published
3.32
Jeffrey Hare
published
3.30
Bryan Shaughnessy
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Artemas Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Alan Rummelsburg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Kevin Confoy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jim Beam
published
3.20
James Borders
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Confoy + Bryan Shaughnessy11362% games+4.9% vs expected
Chris Wixom + Louis Foreman40767% games+4.0% vs expected
Alan Rummelsburg + Bryan Shaughnessy2550% games−2.0% vs expected
Alan Rummelsburg + Jim Beam0539% games−8.8% vs expected
Alan Rummelsburg + Louis Foreman5652% gamesnot enough data
Louis Foreman + Bryan Shaughnessy8365% gamesnot enough data
Alan Rummelsburg + Kevin Confoy4254% gamesnot enough data
Alan Rummelsburg + Chris Wixom314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Wixom
106W–24L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Louis Foreman
266W–112L career · 18 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Marc Lelong
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Jeffrey Hare
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bryan Shaughnessy
57W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Artemas Holmes
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Alan Rummelsburg
62W–83L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Kevin Confoy
64W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jim Beam
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
James Borders
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.