Teams

Ch.Mack18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06vs Je.Monaghen18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesHunter Bassett vs Jeffrey Monaghen6-3, 6-3
2025-04-29vs Ke.Abourisk18AWon 10
W#2 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Ken Glanville6-2, 6-3
2025-04-22vs Ra.Xu18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesHunter Bassett / Blake Hardwick vs Thomas Taylor / Joshua Ganeles6-4, 6-2
2025-04-15vs Er.Beiter18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesHunter Bassett / Blake Hardwick vs Will Howell / Bert Clancey6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Nate Wireback6-4, 6-3
2025-03-25vs Dy.DeMacy18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesHunter Bassett / Blake Hardwick vs Cameron Lange / David Peters3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Daniel Conti6-0, 6-2
2025-03-18vs Ma.Gregson18A4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher MacK / Tevin Wilson vs Aubry Carmody / Jim Riddick1-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs Je.Monaghen18AWon 10
W#2 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Jeffrey Monaghen6-2, 6-3
2025-03-04vs Ke.Abourisk18AWon 20
W#2 DoublesHunter Bassett / Blake Hardwick vs Brian Baron / Nathan Daigle6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTevin Wilson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Alex Renfrow
published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.09
Cameron Crump
published 4.5
3.93
Tevin Wilson
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.88
Spencer Johnson
published
3.87
Hunter Bassett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Jonathan Carter
published
Alex Boggis
published 4
3.67
Christopher MacK
published 4
3.44
Byron Byars
published 4
Nicholas Lau
published
Ryan Madison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher MacK + Jonathan Carter123 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Carter + Spencer Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Renfrow
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Visakan Jayakumar
28W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Cameron Crump
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Tevin Wilson
131W–78L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Spencer Johnson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Hunter Bassett
45W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
Jonathan Carter
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alex Boggis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher MacK
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Eduardo Schlotterhausen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Byron Byars
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Nicholas Lau
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Madison
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.