Teams

State Team

Mixed one team event · 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-23vs WNC C Still (HRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Melissa Potier vs Grant Wilsterman / Cindy Bull8-5
L#3 DoublesAlex Salazar / Cecilia Drake vs Calvin Sullivan / Allison Hunt5-8
2022-07-23vs WNC C Still (HRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Melissa Potier vs Grant Wilsterman / Cindy Bull8-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Salazar / Cecilia Drake vs Cre Still / Stacey Schulhofer9-7
W#3 DoublesSidney Petersen / Samantha Danesis vs Jim Fowler / Abbey Neff8-3
2022-07-23vs WNC C Still (HRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Merino / Lina Clarke vs Cre Still / Cindy Bull8-6
W#2 DoublesRohan Ranadive / Samantha Danesis vs Jim Fowler / Savannah Smith8-4
2022-07-23vs WNC C Still (HRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Merino / Lina Clarke vs Cre Still / Cindy Bull8-6
W#2 DoublesRohan Ranadive / Samantha Danesis vs Jim Fowler / Savannah Smith8-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Samantha Danesis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.59
Anatoly Zelepouga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Diego Gonzalez
published 4.5
4.34
Lina Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Richard Merino
published
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.22
Omar Punjabi
published 4.5
4.21
Sidney Petersen
published
4.04
Rohan Ranadive
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Cecilia Drake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Karen Rocchio
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Samantha Danesis
111W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.61
5
Anatoly Zelepouga
217W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.59
4.5
Diego Gonzalez
34W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Lina Clarke
67W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Richard Merino
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Diana West
34W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Omar Punjabi
66W–21L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Sidney Petersen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Rohan Ranadive
47W–23L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Cecilia Drake
90W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.87
Karen Rocchio
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.