Teams

Knight, Brett

2025 Adult 55 & Over-JXN · Men 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-05vs Merchant, TomLost 02
L#1 DoublesZilin Wang / David Turner vs Kenneth Miller / Rick Blackledge4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Brown / Jitendra Sahoo vs Phillip Pace / Scott Holston4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-30vs Germany, BrianLost 12
W#1 DoublesZilin Wang / David Turner vs Jerry Farr / David Farris6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPatrick Brown / Brett Knight vs Daniel McDill / Mitch Stentiford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Moseley / William Rinehart vs Dan Bokros / Wendell Erwin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-16vs Merchant, TomLost 12
W#1 DoublesZilin Wang / David Turner vs Greg McNair / Randy Harris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Moseley / Brett Knight vs Kenneth Miller / Andy Woodard2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Jitendra Sahoo vs Stanley Jenkins / Tommy Taylor6-7, 3-6
2025-03-02vs Germany, BrianLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Brown / Zilin Wang vs Wendell Erwin / Jerry Farr2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJitendra Sahoo / David Turner vs Craig Alexander / Mitch Wolverton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Moseley / Hector Custode vs Brian Germany / Albert Weeks4-6, 1-6
2025-02-16vs Merchant, TomLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Moseley / Jitendra Sahoo vs Phillip Pace / Greg McNair3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZilin Wang / Patrick Brown vs Tom Merchant / Rick Blackledge4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Knight / David Turner vs Randy Harris / Alan Cialone1-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs Germany, BrianLost 02
L#1 DoublesZilin Wang / William Rinehart vs Mitch Stentiford / Daniel McDill1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrett Knight / James Moseley vs Brian Germany / David Farris0-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Merchant, Tom60171792
2Knight, Brett0631532195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Patrick Brown
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Jitendra Sahoo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Brett Knight
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
William Rinehart
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
James Moseley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Zilin Wang
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Knight + James Moseley044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Patrick Brown
68W–131L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jitendra Sahoo
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Brett Knight
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
William Rinehart
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
James Moseley
14W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Zilin Wang
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.