Teams

RCW - Mowrer

2023 USTA 18 & Over League · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.89 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesAudrey Lubas / Kristine Criswell vs Kristin Jeffries / Madeleine Gerz6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Leach vs Shelby Jones6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Apetrior / Marcy Blitz vs Maria Salinger / Jennifer Graham6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCindy Friedrich vs Kim Wojciechowski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Mowrer / Meghan Salaga vs Vy Banh / Kathleen Schlager6-2, 6-2
2023-07-12vs LCC-NewmanLost 23
W#1 DoublesAudrey Lubas / Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren vs Jill Frey / Sarah Rider3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKasi Conjack vs Suzanne Woodard3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Wright / Marcy Blitz vs Kelly Kurtz / Beth Rice1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmanda Pryzbylkowski vs Barbara Newman3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Apetrior / Beth Lee vs Julia Belser / Heather Spire6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-09vs WSTC @ Messiah University - TrappWon 32
W#1 DoublesAudrey Lubas / Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren vs Sowmya Surapaneni / Sue Shema3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKasi Conjack vs Cindee Trapp1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Acosta / Marcy Blitz vs Jennifer Ball / Brooke Lininger4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Kitlan vs Laura Malinoski6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Mowrer / Kelly Flatt vs Mary Strasbaugh / Linda Donnelly6-4, 6-2
2023-07-08vs Wisehaven-MichelsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristine Criswell / Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren vs Jennifer Miranda / Madison Reed5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Leach / Marcy Blitz vs Elizabeth Wagner / Natalie O'Neill3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKelly Flatt vs Darlene Ashwood6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Wright / Irene Acosta vs Anna Lamond / Ali Zapach7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-25vs Hempfield - ForreyLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristi-Lynne Dahlgren / Audrey Lubas vs Heather Arters / Iris Lehman6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Leach vs Caroline Ulrich6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKasi Conjack / Meghan Salaga vs Sophia Granbois / Katherine Granbois7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCindy Friedrich vs KELLEY HERSHEY1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesIrene Acosta / Kathy Mowrer vs Catherine Ingram / Tiffany Marino6-7, 1-6
2023-05-23vs Hempfield - ScottWon 41
W#1 DoublesAudrey Lubas / Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren vs Bonnie Westheaffer / Madonna Hufnagel6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKasi Conjack vs Sydney Nye6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Leach / Marcy Blitz vs Lori Hunt / Pat Giles7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCindy Friedrich vs Margaret Cruise6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Mowrer / Nicole Wright vs Joy Rynier / Stephanie Seabra2-6, 0-6
2023-05-16vs Hershey - SoulliardLost 23
L#1 DoublesNicole Wright / Irene Acosta vs Samantha Laubenstine / Shannon Corcoran3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Kitlan vs Samantha Bogush3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBeth Lee / Beth Apetrior vs Michele Harnden / Debbie Bray2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKasi Conjack vs Alison Feeney4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristi-Lynne Dahlgren / Kelly Flatt vs Terri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating6-4, 6-3
2023-05-07vs Hempfield - CovellLost 23
W#1 DoublesAudrey Lubas / Kristine Criswell vs Shannon Hewitt / Beth McCormick6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Flatt vs Michele Mccartney3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Lee / Beth Apetrior vs Nancy Opilo / Karen Schaufert4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Pryzbylkowski vs Lauren Goebel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Mowrer / Nicole Wright vs Patricia Lawrence / Lori Tully6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RCW - Mowrer08221844350
2LCC-Newman08192148363
3WSTC @ Messiah University - Trapp08162453381
4Wisehaven-Michels08152554387
5Hempfield - Brunch Babes (Schlager)0873368446

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.77
Audrey Lubas
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
Beth Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Nicole Wright
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Kathy Mowrer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Beth Apetrior
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Kristine Criswell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.48
Cindy Friedrich
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Marcy Blitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Kasi Conjack
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Amanda Pryzbylkowski
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
Emily Leach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Irene Acosta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Kitlan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kelly Flatt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Meghan Salaga
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Lubas + Kristine Criswell6162% games+20.3% vs expected
Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren + Kathy Mowrer5259% games+5.6% vs expected
Beth Apetrior + Kristine Criswell5356% games+4.5% vs expected
Beth Apetrior + Beth Lee231157% games+4.1% vs expected
Audrey Lubas + Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren171255% games+2.7% vs expected
Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren + Kristine Criswell3644% games+2.5% vs expected
Kathy Mowrer + Beth Apetrior5251% gamesnot enough data
Irene Acosta + Kathy Mowrer2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren
116W–81L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Audrey Lubas
113W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Beth Lee
51W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Wright
91W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Kathy Mowrer
50W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
4
Beth Apetrior
94W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Kristine Criswell
248W–122L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
4
Cindy Friedrich
52W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Marcy Blitz
25W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Kasi Conjack
30W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Amanda Pryzbylkowski
57W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Emily Leach
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Irene Acosta
100W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Kitlan
45W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Flatt
41W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Meghan Salaga
33W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.