Teams

AR/Wallman/BV Beauties

2022 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-28vs AR/Johnson/HSWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Jones / Connie Gempler vs Joann Privitello / Judy Starrett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNorma Hamm / Sara Bainbridge vs Janet McAdams / Faye Hudson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaggie Johnston / Sandra Quinn vs Kathryn Peacock / Linda Taylor6-3, 6-1
2022-04-27vs AR/Wood/LRWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Jones / Connie Gempler vs Nora Goss / Carol Stapleton6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNorma Hamm / Sara Bainbridge vs Betsy McClendon / Doris Dill6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Wallman / Maggie Johnston vs Theia Foley / Reba Reynolds6-3, 6-4
2022-04-26vs TX/Vernor/San AntonioWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Quinn / Leslie Jones vs Jo Ann Byrd / Marilyn Watson6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Wallman / Maggie Johnston vs Terry Peel / Judy Langford0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNorma Hamm / Sara Bainbridge vs Sheila Wilson / Janet Hudson7-6, 6-4
2022-04-26vs OK/Canfield/TulsaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Jones / Sandra Quinn vs Bonnie Bell / Barbara Evans6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Bainbridge / Norma Hamm vs Vibsen Lay / Vivienne Culver6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Wallman / Maggie Johnston vs Deborah Lee / Bonnie Canfield6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Norma Hamm
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Linda Wallman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Connie Gempler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Bainbridge
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norma Hamm + Sara Bainbridge11364% games+12.3% vs expected
Maggie Johnston + Linda Wallman8557% games−5.5% vs expected
Sandra Quinn + Maggie Johnston213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Norma Hamm
30W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Linda Wallman
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Connie Gempler
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Johnston
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Quinn
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Bainbridge
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.