Teams

Apollo Beach - L. Greenlee

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-12-04vs Tampa Yacht White - A. ShoukryLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Greenlee / Janet George vs Patricia Brawley / Jennifer Garlick1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRene Kenyon vs Kristine Chunn3-6, 2-6
2020-11-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesMary Beth Sultenfuss vs Leslie Herrion5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2020-11-06vs Harbour Island - S. WilsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesMary Beth Sultenfuss vs Amy Bodine1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMary Beth Sultenfuss vs Maechi Ayoola2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Bell / Janet George vs Jennifer Robinson / Sonia Patrick0-6, 2-6
2020-10-23vs River Hills - A. PicheLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Greenlee / Rene Kenyon vs Angela Piche / Melanie Skinner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelley Cargle vs June Rogers1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Bramlett / Mary Beth Sultenfuss vs Michelle Bonilla / Aurora Finucane6-2, 6-2
2020-10-02vs Tampa Yacht Blue - M. O'ConnorWon 21
W#1 DoublesTheresa Anderson / Rene Kenyon vs Anne Butler / Merritt Barrow6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKelley Cargle vs Audrey Goodwin6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Bell / Janet George vs Carolyn Murnane / Dorothy Alfonso6-2, 6-3
2020-09-25vs Cheval Dare Doubles - F. AldeenWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Beth Sultenfuss vs Farheen Aldeen6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Debra Whiteside
published 4
3.73
Debra Bell
published 4
3.70
Kelley Cargle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Rene Kenyon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.41
Janet George
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Mary Beth Sultenfuss
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michele Bramlett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Sultenfuss + Rene Kenyon5451% gamesnot enough data
Mary Beth Sultenfuss + Janet George5359% gamesnot enough data
Mary Beth Sultenfuss + Kelley Cargle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Whiteside
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Debra Bell
11W–15L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kelley Cargle
96W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Rene Kenyon
44W–45L career · 3 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
Janet George
115W–97L career · 3 lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
3.41
Mary Beth Sultenfuss
81W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
3.36
Michele Bramlett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.