Teams

Reyes

2025 Adult 40 & Over · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-05vs LambsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracy Duggins / Rebecca Hare vs Cecilia Chen / Andrea Shultz4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRamona Behshad vs Ivy Alwell0-6, 1-6
2025-07-22vs LambsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Hare / Tracy Duggins vs Carolyn Vlaich / Cecilia Chen2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSeember Ityokumbul vs Ivy Alwell6-1, 6-4
2025-06-24vs LambsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlisa Kelley / Mireille El Hayek vs Cecilia Chen / Lucy Hong4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRamona Behshad / Rebecca Hare vs Ivy Alwell / Carolyn Vlaich3-6, 0-6
2025-06-17vs LambsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlisa Kelley / Mireille El Hayek vs Cecilia Chen / Lucy Hong2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRamona Behshad vs Ivy Alwell7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Hare / April Santos vs Carolyn Vlaich / Andrea Shultz4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Alisa Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.41
Seember Ityokumbul
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
ROSELYN REYES-TEACH
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.34
Tracy Duggins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
April Santos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Mireille El Hayek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Rebecca Hare
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.97
Ramona Behshad
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alisa Kelley + ROSELYN REYES-TEACH3254% games+9.3% vs expected
ROSELYN REYES-TEACH + Tracy Duggins224 matchesnot enough data
Mireille El Hayek + Rebecca Hare123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alisa Kelley
25W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
Seember Ityokumbul
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
ROSELYN REYES-TEACH
29W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Tracy Duggins
25W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
April Santos
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mireille El Hayek
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Rebecca Hare
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Ramona Behshad
7W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.