Teams

Miller/HCP/Foothills

2023 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 6.5 Combo Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-21vs Diamonti/LHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Chris Summers vs Sandi Horyza / Ashley Stahlschmidt6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-14vs Shokes/Fuller/CCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Paula Gettys vs Maggie Cowie / Elise Wright6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-09-07vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Chris Summers vs Marsha Phillips / Penny Rylott5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEstera Biscos / Natalie von Allmen vs Mitzi Arrowood / DeAnna Finger4-6, 3-6
2023-08-24vs Shokes/Fuller/CCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesAleshia Abernathy / Paula Gettys vs Shannon Fuller / Elise Wright3-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesKelly Miller / Natalie von Allmen vs Sondra Simmons / Denise Moose4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Ellen Stupka
published 4
3.15
Paula Gettys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.12
Cori Peters
published 3.5
3.08
Estera Biscos
published
3.06
Aleshia Abernathy
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.00
Jennifer Dufour
published
2.95
Chris Summers
published 3
2.92
Natalie von Allmen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Nancy James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Gettys + Chris Summers5258% games−0.8% vs expected
Natalie von Allmen + Aleshia Abernathy16855% games−1.8% vs expected
Paula Gettys + Aleshia Abernathy3640% gamesnot enough data
Paula Gettys + Natalie von Allmen3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Stupka
72W–37L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Paula Gettys
75W–118L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Cori Peters
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Estera Biscos
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
3.5
Aleshia Abernathy
165W–131L career · 7 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Dufour
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Chris Summers
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Natalie von Allmen
190W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Nancy James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.