Teams

RAddison/KMoore (Park Road)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-08vs SChandler (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Cardell / Mary Claire Brown vs Katie Eggers / Niki Koesel0-6, 3-6
2025-09-24vs LHuntington (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Claire Brown / Paige Cardell vs Punky Brick / Paula Olive6-2, 6-2
2025-09-17vs KGreathouse/JBee (Russell)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Margaret Hutchins / Mary Kathryn Lozzi vs Debbie Barnes / Jena Lepkowski6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrittany Julian / Sallie Wilson vs Alexandra Centeno / Ellen Underwood6-2, 6-0
2025-09-10vs HLee/Rock (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Cardell / Anna Margaret Hutchins vs Emily Pease / Hayley Franc1-6, 2-6
2025-09-03vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPaige Cardell / Courtney Stallmann vs Elisa Salim / Wenxian Xu1-6, 0-6
2025-08-27vs KLull/LPowell (Bridgehampton)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaige Cardell / Anna Margaret Hutchins vs Maria del Mar Vazquez / Jennifer Robinette3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Ashley Dutton
published 3.5
2.88
2.87
Paige Cardell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Mary Claire Brown
published
2.78
Katherine Winfrey
published
2.78
Belle Landzert
published 3
2.77
Anna Margaret Hutchins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Katie Jernigan
published
2.66
Catherine Tharp
published 3
2.61
Rachel Addison
published
2.59
Brittany Julian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jillian Langston
published
Mary Kathryn Lozzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sallie Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Tharp + Belle Landzert213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Dutton + Anna Margaret Hutchins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Dutton
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3
Courtney Stallmann
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Paige Cardell
22W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Mary Claire Brown
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Katherine Winfrey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Belle Landzert
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Anna Margaret Hutchins
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Katie Jernigan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Catherine Tharp
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Rachel Addison
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Brittany Julian
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jillian Langston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kathryn Lozzi
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sallie Wilson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.