Teams

SPTC Pruett

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-03vs RCSP FaraciWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Ladden / Rima Terradista vs Zhanna Thomas / Daiva di Vito6-2, 6-1
2023-05-20vs Pinellas/Dunn/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesRima Terradista / Bobbi-Jo Willett vs Amy Lovett Dunn / Tricia Lolkus1-6, 6-7
2023-04-22vs Tarpon ColemanWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Ladden / Rima Terradista vs Carol Petroc / Gabriela Tanase6-1, 6-2
2023-04-15vs RCSP FaraciWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Jacome / Rima Terradista vs Trish Smith / Kathy Wallen6-0, 6-1
2023-04-01vs Seminole Lake JordanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRima Terradista / Bobbi-Jo Willett vs Elizabeth Jordan / Debra Edwards6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Jennifer Gibson
published
3.08
Meg DeSomery
published
2.91
Rima Terradista
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Lisa Jacome
published
2.79
Abby Sterensis
published 3
2.79
Bobbi-Jo Willett
published 3
2.78
Christine Assefa
published 3
Amy Ladden
published 3
Jamie Connelly
published 3
2.75
Kelly Bernish
published
2.71
Kimberly Fiorino
published
MELISSA CHAVES
published
Melissa Wirt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Gibson + Meg DeSomery4158% games−1.3% vs expected
Bobbi-Jo Willett + Kelly Bernish303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gibson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.61
Meg DeSomery
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Rima Terradista
65W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.91
Lisa Jacome
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Abby Sterensis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Bobbi-Jo Willett
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Christine Assefa
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Amy Ladden
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jamie Connelly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Bernish
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
Kimberly Fiorino
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
MELISSA CHAVES
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Wirt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.