← Teams

THPRD-Cassin/Garland

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Sandy Swift
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Bernadette Lisac
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Susie Garland
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Ann Cassin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Gina Ariosa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Anna Boyarshinova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results10 ties
2021-12-05Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Sharon Reese vs Deb Garris / Janae Pyle6-2, 6-4
2021-12-03Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Anna Boyarshinova vs Timothea Barnatan / Dottie Quinn Jacobs6-4, 6-1
2021-11-07Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesSharon Reese / Ann Cassin vs Monica Christensen / Linda Clayton6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Fei / Gina Ariosa vs Janice Thomas / Susan Judge3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-30Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMary Jesse / Bernadette Lisac vs Mary Murphy / Kim Wright6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Boyarshinova / Sandra Ellis vs Julia Hall / Rico McIver6-1, 7-5
2021-10-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBernadette Lisac / Kathleen Murrin vs Janet Monnier / Mary Priester6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Mary Jesse vs Paula Conway / Garrene Mcgale6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Boyarshinova / Susie Garland vs Lisa Bledsoe / Michelle Johnson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-23Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBernadette Lisac / Julie Bradford vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Traci Laurent6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSusie Garland / Sharon Reese vs Stacey Burkhart / Kathy Rogers6-1, 6-3
2021-10-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSandy Swift / Julie Bradford vs Laura Laney / Peg McClendon0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Bernadette Lisac vs Alison Davis / Catherine Leedy6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Boyarshinova / Ann Cassin vs Carolyn Bachhuber / Kim Wright7-5, 6-0
2021-10-03Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJulie Bradford / Sandy Swift vs Marianne Conroy / Kathleen Budnick6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGina Ariosa / Susie Garland vs Christina Gibson / Sandie Yamauchi7-6, 6-3
2021-09-25Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAnn Cassin / Sandy Swift vs Lisa Bledsoe / Michelle Johnson6-3, 6-4
2021-09-10Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fei / Sandy Swift vs Marianne Conroy / Gretchen Dumestre6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Boyarshinova / Ann Cassin vs Christina Gibson / Patty Mamula6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Sandy Swift
45W–49L career
6%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Bernadette Lisac
21W–28L career
12%88%0%
3.11
3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Ann Cassin
45W–69L career
26%74%0%
3.04
3
Gina Ariosa
24W–46L career
0%80%20%
2.96
3
Anna Boyarshinova
52W–65L career
0%98%2%
2.83

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.