Teams

Hunter

2023 TRI-LEVEL- IDAHO FALLS · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.19 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-17vs Day/DummarWon 30
W#1 DoublesCrista Rostrom / Mandy Hall vs Sonja Facer / Kristine Parker6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Valerie Day / Kylie Pierce6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEli Griffin / Kamarie Hearne vs Kate Miller / Shelby Hanson6-2, 6-4
2023-04-11vs Preece/MangumLost 03
L#1 DoublesMandy Hall / Monica Fowers vs Lindsey Stevens / Rebecca Hansen6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Lindsey Mangum / Mckenna Dutcher7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKamarie Hearne / Elise Shurtliff vs Jennifer Preece / Corinne Parker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs Doubles or Nothin'Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElise Shurtliff / Kamarie Hearne vs Holly Gyles / Lisa Wheeler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Jessica Bare / Kelly Harrison4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Fowers / Crista Rostrom vs Sherry Wilson / Kara Petersen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-07vs Day/DummarWon 30
W#1 DoublesMandy Hall / Monica Fowers vs Sonja Facer / Monica Kuhn6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Kate Miller / Kylie Pierce6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKamarie Hearne / Elise Shurtliff vs Karri Sloan / Shelby Hanson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-04vs Doubles or Nothin'Lost 12
W#1 DoublesEli Griffin / Kamarie Hearne vs Holly Gyles / Margo Nef5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Susan Hulse / Rebecca Lanier3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMandy Hall / Monica Fowers vs Jennifer Sewell / Sherry Wilson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-01vs Day/DummarWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Fowers / Crista Rostrom vs Monica Kuhn / Kristine Parker6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAshley Benson / Christina Hunter vs Kate Miller / Valerie Day6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEli Griffin / Elise Shurtliff vs Bonnie Peterson / Karri Sloan6-4, 6-3
2023-03-28vs Preece/MangumWon 21
L#1 DoublesCrista Rostrom / Mandy Hall vs Lindsey Stevens / Michelle Marlowe4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Corinne Parker / Katy Chambers6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEli Griffin / Elise Shurtliff vs Tera Craig / Tawni Howell7-5, 6-4
2023-03-25vs Doubles or Nothin'Won 21
L#1 DoublesCrista Rostrom / Monica Fowers vs Kara Petersen / Sherry Wilson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Benson / Christina Hunter vs Susan Stueve / Kelly Harrison6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElise Shurtliff / Kamarie Hearne vs Karin Edwards / Lisa Wheeler7-6, 6-4
2023-03-15vs Preece/MangumLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Hunter / Ashley Benson vs Lindsey Mangum / Jennifer Preece4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCrista Rostrom / Mandy Hall vs Michelle Marlowe / Kimberly Wynn6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEli Griffin / Kamarie Hearne vs Mckenna Dutcher / Ronee Ross6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Doubles or Nothin'6318925238
2Preece/Mangum54151230251
3Hunter54141330251
4Day/Dummar2772042291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Elise Shurtliff
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.07
Kamarie Hearne
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Eli Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Christina Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.73
Monica Fowers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Ashley Benson
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.55
Crista Rostrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.19
Mandy Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kamarie Hearne + Eli Griffin9455% games+8.2% vs expected
Ashley Benson + Christina Hunter131153% games+2.9% vs expected
Kamarie Hearne + Elise Shurtliff5160% games−0.4% vs expected
Monica Fowers + Crista Rostrom21040% games−13.6% vs expected
Monica Fowers + Mandy Hall4349% gamesnot enough data
Crista Rostrom + Mandy Hall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elise Shurtliff
118W–99L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Kamarie Hearne
142W–127L career · 7 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Eli Griffin
60W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Christina Hunter
42W–36L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Monica Fowers
84W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ashley Benson
78W–85L career · 9 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Crista Rostrom
62W–143L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Mandy Hall
76W–107L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.