Teams

ESpeicher

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Ostrander / Jennifer McEntee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-02vs EPiechocinskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Ostrander / Jamie Breunig vs Erin Piechocinski / Hartley Watts5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-11vs EPiechocinskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Ostrander / Elizabeth Speicher vs Ashley Rogers / Betsy Shoffner6-7, 4-6
2022-08-28vs HRemley - CAP 9.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Ostrander / Rachel Davis vs Kelly Moler Glass / Tanita Tedamrongwanish3-6, 1-6
2022-08-21vs KStronachWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Ostrander / Elizabeth Speicher vs Neal Goodwin / Sarah Barnhill7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Jamie Breunig
published 5
4.64
4.42
Jennifer Reese
published
4.41
Colleen Brown
published 4.5
4.33
Jessica Mauney
published
4.03
Allison Ostrander
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.01
Lorraine Bowen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.66
5
Elizabeth Speicher
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
Jennifer Reese
30W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Colleen Brown
26W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
4.41
Jessica Mauney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
4.33
4.5
Allison Ostrander
301W–152L career · 7 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
Lorraine Bowen
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.