Teams

FK Drawdy

2024 Marion Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesChristy Ulbricht / Jennifer Hewitson vs Leigh Chak / Jessica Bonano6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTanner Watts / Debby Watts vs Dana Pine / Amanda Miller6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesChristy Ulbricht / Jennifer Hewitson vs Mime Ichini-Lurie / Cammie McLeod6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTanner Watts / Debby Watts vs Gwenda Ward / Rene Stinnett6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeatrice Barlet / Lauren Stevenson vs Kayleen Quinn / Susan Atwell7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Lisa Steed vs Rene Stinnett / Gwenda Ward6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesChristy Ulbricht / Jennifer Boyd vs Leigh Chak / Cammie McLeod1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Lisa Steed vs Amanda Miller / Dana Pine6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJudy Hoops / Beatrice Barlet vs Kayleen Quinn / Nicole Millsaps1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Christy Ulbricht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Debby Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Lauren Stevenson
published
3.64
Lisa Steed
published
3.55
Beatrice Barlet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Judy Hoops
published
Jennifer Boyd
published
Jennifer Hewitson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Ulbricht + Debby Watts7651% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Ulbricht
107W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Lauren Stevenson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
Lisa Steed
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Beatrice Barlet
100W–104L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jennifer Boyd
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Hewitson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.