Teams

Biloxi-Lyons

2022 Mixed 40 & Over-GC · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Yvette Weeks
published
3.17
Bob Thunelius
published 3.5
2.96
Patrick Chubb
published
2.86
Joe Mitchell
published
2.76
Lisa Rowell
published
2.74
Shaun Yeaman
published
2.66
David Thames
published 3
Joanne Olita
published
John OKeefe
published
Vicki McLean
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yvette Weeks
28W–20L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bob Thunelius
58W–55L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Patrick Chubb
24W–29L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Joe Mitchell
62W–77L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Lisa Rowell
7W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Shaun Yeaman
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
David Thames
20W–49L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Joanne Olita
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John OKeefe
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicki McLean
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.