Teams

Wentz/Knoxville

2025 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-29vs TN/Knoxville/Curtin-KennedyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Szwarc / Sheri Kilbey vs Ann Curtin / Lea Ann Fields6-2, 6-0
2025-09-24vs TN/Knoxville/Curtin-KennedyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Angie Herzog vs A Marie Kennedy / Ann Curtin7-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Ren / Deborah Szwarc vs Lea Ann Fields / Karen Dail6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Helen Ericson vs Christina Johnson / Erica Butler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-16vs Campbell/EagenWon 21
L#1 DoublesShelly Ren / Gina O'Neil vs Jodie Campbell / Cindy Henry1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Herzog / Sheri Kilbey vs Michele Hall Craig / Paige Troutman1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJo Davis / Deborah Szwarc vs Ida Randall / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick6-1, 7-6
2025-08-09vs Campbell/EagenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAngie Herzog / Claudia Stallings vs Dena Teague / Jodie Campbell0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Helen Ericson vs Jennifer Campbell / Michele Hall Craig6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Angie Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Helen Ericson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Deborah Szwarc
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Shelly Ren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Anita Downes
published 3
2.95
Martha Wilds
published
2.91
Sandy Garrard
published
2.88
Tara Osborne-Martz
published
2.83
Helena Liuag
published
Bonnie Hebert
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Herzog + Helen Ericson2345% games+3.7% vs expected
Anita Downes + Helena Liuag4358% games+2.9% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Deborah Szwarc2540% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Szwarc + Shelly Ren4159% gamesnot enough data
Martha Wilds + Helena Liuag224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Herzog
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Helen Ericson
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Deborah Szwarc
20W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Shelly Ren
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Anita Downes
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.14
Martha Wilds
25W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sandy Garrard
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Tara Osborne-Martz
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Helena Liuag
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Bonnie Hebert
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.