Teams

WDawson (Olde Providence)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-29vs JCook (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Victor Adams6-0, 6-0
2024-04-22vs KSwain (Col Beatty)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTai Kam / Scott Hamer vs Varadh Srinivasan / Rakesh Padhy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrian Jennaro vs Sourav Parida6-3, 6-2
2024-04-15vs SSofsian (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrian Jennaro / Wally Dawson vs Joshua Benton / Jay Offerdahl7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesScott Hamer vs Mark Richards7-5, 6-1
2024-04-01vs JDichak (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTai Kam / Jerry Lee vs Joseph Dichak / Frank Grindle6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Jennaro / Rusty Parker vs Kevin Staley / Michael Twer6-0, 6-0
2024-03-18vs DJoo (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesHenry Ko / Scott Hamer vs Biju Nair / Stephen Polacek6-1, 6-2
2024-03-11vs MMerkel (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWally Dawson / Tai Kam vs Brooke Beacham / Keith Lowe4-6, 2-6
2024-03-04vs GQuattlebaum (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Jennaro / Scott Hamer vs Kent Smith / Rohan Paul6-2, 5-1
2024-02-26vs AHunt (Matthews)Split 11
W#2 DoublesScott Hamer / Brian Jennaro vs Jim Layne / Jim Stout6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTai Kam / Roman Streitberger vs Andy Hunt / Jeff Johnson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Brian Jennaro
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.82
Scott Hamer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Henry Ko
published
3.43
Eric Jenkins
published
3.42
Jose Bermudez
published
3.40
Wally Dawson
published
3.38
Will Smith
published
3.17
Tai Kam
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.98
Rusty Parker
published
Eric Chaniot
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Jennaro
50W–5L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
4.21
4
Scott Hamer
61W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Henry Ko
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Eric Jenkins
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jose Bermudez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Wally Dawson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Will Smith
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Tai Kam
40W–65L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Rusty Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.98
Eric Chaniot
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.