Teams

Mystery Guys

2024 Fall Combo -2 Sundays · 7.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-17vs Ryan's Mystery MENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAaron Griffin / Arne Krogh vs Phu Ngo / PAUL RISSE4-8
W#2 DoublesJames Robinson / Andrew Teasley vs Matthew Do / Daniel Whitfield8-5
2023-09-17vs JoeWon 20
W#1 DoublesAaron Griffin / Arne Krogh vs Randolph Bailey / Joe Buckwalter8-2
W#2 DoublesJames Robinson / Andrew Teasley vs Kawai Fregly / Arnaldo Hernandez8-1
2023-09-17vs Green EnergyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAaron Griffin / James Robinson vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Willy Stone8-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Teasley / Arne Krogh vs David Leclair / Michael Leonard8-0
2023-09-10vs Green EnergyLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Teasley / Aaron Griffin vs David Leclair / Shawn Almario8-4
L#2 DoublesGarrett Danner / Arne Krogh vs Willy Stone / Derek Stone6-8
L#3 DoublesJames Robinson / Douglas Henie vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Alan Green4-8
2023-09-10vs JoeWon 30
W#1 DoublesAaron Griffin / Andrew Teasley vs Kawai Fregly / Thomas Ngo8-2
W#2 DoublesArne Krogh / James Robinson vs Randolph Bailey / Ethan Kazmierczak8-6
W#3 DoublesDouglas Henie / Garrett Danner vs Korben Senden / Tom Marchesani8-1
2023-09-10vs Ryan's Mystery MENWon 30
W#1 DoublesAaron Griffin / Andrew Teasley vs Phu Ngo / Richard Clendaniel9-8
W#2 DoublesJames Robinson / Garrett Danner vs Ryan Jaramillo / Matthew Do8-1
W#3 DoublesArne Krogh / Douglas Henie vs Daniel Whitfield / Douglas Bliss8-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mystery Guys42126687
2Green Energy42108894
3Ryan's Mystery MEN3381010113

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Teasley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Garrett Danner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
James Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.43
Arne Krogh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Douglas Henie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aaron Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Robinson + Andrew Teasley7075% games+17.8% vs expected
Aaron Griffin + Andrew Teasley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Teasley
59W–11L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Garrett Danner
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
James Robinson
42W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Arne Krogh
30W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Douglas Henie
44W–35L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Aaron Griffin
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.