Teams

GSCC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-28vs BASALT GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Siri Olsen vs Karen Price / Corin Brucker6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKeely Eberly vs Denise Taylor4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSasha Enewold / Amy Roggie vs Ashley Richardson / Leslie Riddel6-1, 6-1
2025-07-26vs GSCC SILVERWon 30
W#1 DoublesSiri Olsen / Ksana Oglesby vs Amy Thornton / Brady Emens6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKatie Winder / Amy Roggie vs Kate McRaith / Nancy Nordell7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Heidi Paul / Judi Simecek6-2, 6-4
2025-07-23vs HCC PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Siri Olsen vs Stacy Brookman / Mary Ellen Wanty2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKsana Oglesby vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Boyd / Amy Roggie vs Kristen Calarco / Rose Braden6-3, 6-2
2025-07-07vs BASALT GOLDLost 13
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Siri Olsen vs Valerie Yaw / Leslie Riddel6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKsana Oglesby vs Denise Taylor0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Roggie / Stacey Adams vs Tsvetana Mawicke / Lauren Noble1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKeely Eberly / Katie Winder vs Ashley Richardson / Marilyn Ortmann1-6, 4-6
2025-06-30vs RVR GOLDLost 13
W#1 DoublesSiri Olsen / Stacey Adams vs Barb Lansky / Dianne Leoni6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Roggie vs Katie Bailey6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Sale / Natalie Torres vs Amy Filiss / Jennifer Given6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeely Eberly / Ksana Oglesby vs Katie Karow / Susan Blizzard0-6, 1-6
2025-06-23vs HCC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Adams / Amy Roggie vs Erin Boselli / Deborah Griffin6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKsana Oglesby vs Rose Braden4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Sale / Siri Olsen vs Deborah Long / Kristen Calarco6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Stacey Adams
published
3.46
Siri Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.43
Amy Roggie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Sale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Mary Boyd
published
3.24
Natalie Torres
published
3.04
Keely Eberly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Susie Demers
published
2.80
Ksana Oglesby
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Katie Winder
published
Sasha Enewold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ksana Oglesby + Siri Olsen10561% games+9.1% vs expected
Anne Sale + Stacey Adams6455% games−1.0% vs expected
Anne Sale + Siri Olsen20171% games−1.1% vs expected
Amy Roggie + Mary Boyd5256% games−2.4% vs expected
Anne Sale + Amy Roggie2454% gamesnot enough data
Anne Sale + Ksana Oglesby134 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Adams + Siri Olsen404 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Adams + Keely Eberly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Adams
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Siri Olsen
95W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Amy Roggie
95W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sale
88W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Mary Boyd
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Natalie Torres
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Keely Eberly
33W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Susie Demers
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Ksana Oglesby
26W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Katie Winder
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sasha Enewold
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.