Teams

3 MAC Captain Morgans Stand

2024 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.18 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Craig Morgan
published 4.5
Geordie Stewart
published 4.5
4.22
Bradley Snyder
published 4.5
4.19
Sung Kang
published 4.5
4.05
Alex Neuwelt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.88
Charlie Wilson
published 4
3.87
Don Busick
published 4
3.85
James Holland
published 4
3.84
Jonathan McDorman
published
3.82
Charles Samson
published 4
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.25
Benjamin Andrews
published 3.5
Samuel Holley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Holland + Don Busick224 matchesnot enough data
James Holland + Charles Samson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Morgan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Geordie Stewart
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Bradley Snyder
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Alex Neuwelt
260W–119L career · 8 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Charlie Wilson
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Don Busick
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
James Holland
28W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
Jonathan McDorman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Charles Samson
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Benjamin Andrews
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
Samuel Holley
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.