Teams

Cottrell/Knoxville

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.5 Mixed 18&over

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-28vs OPEN/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrent Markowitz / Keileen Cullen vs Spencer Johnson / Gabriella Rimmer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEli MacOn / Amanda Wilson vs Mei Ling Gingrich / Sean Wilson6-3, 6-3
2025-07-19vs OPEN/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesDouglas Corbett / Barbara Miller vs Andrew Spears / Mei Ling Gingrich6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Brent Markowitz vs Gabriella Rimmer / Sean Wilson6-4, 6-2
2025-07-13vs OPEN/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Corbett / Misty Cottrell vs Peter Brewer / Natalie Harrison6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrent Markowitz / Rachel Kimmel vs Elena Burns / Sean Wilson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Foust / Kathrine Klenske vs Andrew Spears / Gabriella Rimmer6-1, 6-3
2025-07-05vs OPEN/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristie Danby / John Foust vs Elena Burns / Sean Wilson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEli MacOn / Kathrine Klenske vs Spencer Johnson / Gabriella Rimmer7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKeileen Cullen / Blake Trusty vs Peter Brewer / Natalie Harrison1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Mixed 18&over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brent Markowitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Douglas Corbett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Misty Cottrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Kristie Danby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Rachel Kimmel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Eli MacOn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
John Foust
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Blake Trusty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.74
Kathrine Klenske
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Keileen Cullen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brent Markowitz
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas Corbett
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Misty Cottrell
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Kristie Danby
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Rachel Kimmel
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Eli MacOn
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
John Foust
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Blake Trusty
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
Kathrine Klenske
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Keileen Cullen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.