Teams

KLaan-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-12vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesKristi Laan vs Celina Morice6-7, 2-3
2025-07-07vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesKristi Laan vs Deborah Hertzog6-1, 7-6
2025-06-16vs SEasterling-HVCCLost 02
L#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Mary Susan Easterling5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesKarli Eller vs Alana Argersinger2-6, 4-6
2025-06-10vs GLoFrese-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Dr Amy Linder6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Gretchen LoFrese7-6, 6-1
2025-06-09vs AJarvis-CHTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesKristi Laan vs Breah Woolson6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHannah White vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-02vs AJarvis-CHTCWon 10
W#3 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Lisa Baxter6-3, 6-4
2025-05-19vs KTravis-EVWon 20
W#2 SinglesKarli Eller vs Ami Young6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKristi Laan vs Emma Gould6-4, 7-5
2025-05-12vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Anne Confer6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Elizabeth Chan
published
3.60
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Karli Eller
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Sarah Franks
published
3.38
Kristi Laan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Christine Gladman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Hannah White
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karli Eller + Christine Gladman7169% games+12.1% vs expected
Hannah White + Christine Gladman6459% games+9.3% vs expected
Kristi Laan + Mary Jo Dunnington9460% games+6.0% vs expected
Karli Eller + Mary Jo Dunnington21761% games+5.7% vs expected
Sarah Franks + Hannah White3345% games−2.1% vs expected
Kristi Laan + Karli Eller4351% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Laan + Hannah White1539% gamesnot enough data
Hannah White + Mary Jo Dunnington4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Chan
34W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
255W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Karli Eller
162W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Sarah Franks
52W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Kristi Laan
262W–181L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Christine Gladman
78W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Hannah White
87W–144L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Berna Tareen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.