Teams

ESTC-Doubles Divas

2025 ADULT 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-04vs S OR-STSC-MurdockLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Wright / Irana Hawkins vs Liz Bennett / Katharine Lemcke4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesHan Gourley vs Rebecca Ostergaard1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBritannia Hobbs / Sarah Olson vs Jessica Mardock / Julie Hook6-4, 6-4
2025-05-04vs S OR-STSC-MurdockLost 12
L#1 DoublesBritannia Hobbs / Chelsey Lee vs Rebecca Ostergaard / Julie Hook0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Olson vs Liz Bennett7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Wayte / Irana Hawkins vs Katharine Lemcke / Sarah Hall2-6, 3-6
2025-05-03vs S OR-STSC-MurdockLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrana Hawkins / Amber Wright vs Sarah Hall / Julie Hook6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHan Gourley vs Katharine Lemcke7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Wayte / Sarah Olson vs Liz Bennett / Jessica Mardock2-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs S OR-STSC-MurdockLost 12
L#1 DoublesHan Gourley / Britannia Hobbs vs Sarah Hall / Liz Bennett1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Olson vs Rebecca Ostergaard1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Wayte / Irana Hawkins vs Katharine Lemcke / Julie Hook7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-STSC-Murdock4084995
2ESTC-Doubles Divas044817131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Kristin Mackey
published
2.45
Britannia Hobbs
published 2.5
2.43
Han Gourley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Amber Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.97
Chelsey Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Irana Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Wayte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Mackey
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Britannia Hobbs
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.45
Han Gourley
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
2.5
Amber Wright
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Chelsey Lee
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Irana Hawkins
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Wayte
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Olson
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.