Teams

BHRC - McIntosh

2026 B'ham Spring - 40 & Over Women Weekend: 9 am · 4.0 Women Saturday 9 am

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-03vs PRC - SteedLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrances Wang / Stephanie Hester vs Anastasia Payne / Brenda Cohen2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGina McIntosh / Summer Aldrich vs Hayley House / Leslie Housman3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSherry Clark / DARLENE STANFORD vs Karen Keene / Linda Sink0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-18vs PRC - Bradley/MeredithWon 31
W#1 DoublesSherry Clark / DARLENE STANFORD vs Liana Byrd / Nadia Krumins6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJamie Burke vs Stephanie Mullen3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hester / Frances Wang vs Judith Lazenby / Nicole Meredith6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Coleman / Summer Aldrich vs Melanie Frusterio / Wendy Nace6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-11vs PTCC - KellyWon 31
W#1 DoublesFrances Wang / Stephanie Hester vs Bridget Sikora / Elizabeth Gilmer6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJamie Burke vs Rhiannon Sharpe1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Clark / DARLENE STANFORD vs Michelle Kelly / Maurine Halpern6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGina McIntosh / Shirley Vest vs Elena Bearden / Elizabeth Humphreys6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-04vs VCC - LaRoccaLost 04
L#1 DoublesShirley Vest / Summer Aldrich vs Sarah Bingham / Meredith Plains4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Burke vs Sue Willis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Hester / Frances Wang vs Ashleigh Knight / Reagan Johnson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGina McIntosh / Sherry Clark vs Tiffany LaRocca / Ashley Hood2-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs BH - Shirley/FehrSplit 22
W#1 DoublesFrances Wang / Stephanie Hester vs Lisa Fehr / Sarah Wright7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJamie Burke vs Laura Harvey3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina McIntosh / Amy Coleman vs Tina Mills / Suzette Pflaum2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBrantley Bowden / Amy Oliver vs Lani Perrigo / Sarah Mizell6-2, 6-1
2026-03-14vs PRC - SteedSplit 22
L#1 DoublesShirley Vest / Summer Aldrich vs Hayley House / Holly Sherrer3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Burke vs Meredith Vinson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherry Clark / DARLENE STANFORD vs Lisa Steed / Karen Keene5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina McIntosh / Elizabeth Tullos vs Anastasia Payne / Linda Sink0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Saturday 9 am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Brantley Bowden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Amy Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Shirley Vest
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Sherry Clark
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Frances Wang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
Stephanie Hester
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
DARLENE STANFORD
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Amy Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Gina McIntosh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Donna Gordon
published
3.50
Summer Aldrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Jamie Burke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Elizabeth Tullos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Sherri Lynn Murdock
published
Elizabeth Harkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Oliver + Brantley Bowden201753% games+2.1% vs expected
Stephanie Hester + Frances Wang5451% games−1.7% vs expected
DARLENE STANFORD + Sherry Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Brantley Bowden + Sherry Clark224 matchesnot enough data
Summer Aldrich + Elizabeth Harkins213 matchesnot enough data
Summer Aldrich + Gina McIntosh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brantley Bowden
63W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Amy Oliver
40W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Shirley Vest
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Sherry Clark
47W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
Frances Wang
17W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Stephanie Hester
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
DARLENE STANFORD
14W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Amy Coleman
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
Gina McIntosh
18W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Donna Gordon
28W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Summer Aldrich
8W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Jamie Burke
26W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Elizabeth Tullos
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Sherri Lynn Murdock
22W–25L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Harkins
17W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.