Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Follette

2025 Winter League-Saturday · 3.0M Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-27vs Liberty Park Tennis-VisserLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Harrington / Mark Follette vs Arnel Cruz / Charles St Jeor4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Crowther / Hamza Qadeer vs Nick Arismendi / Daniel Ramirez1-6, 2-6
2025-03-15vs Sports Mall-LawSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHamza Qadeer / Robert Harrington vs Reed Reinhold / BART SHARP6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Crowther / Ethan Lee vs Andrew Keys / BRIAN DUNCAN1-6, 3-6
2025-03-08vs Salt Lake Tennis-SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Follette / Hamza Qadeer vs Brian Smith / Jordan Parise7-5, 3-1
L#2 DoublesEthan Lee / Rick Cromar vs Cody Haroldsen / Jesse Gordon4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Moxley / Charles Crowther vs Michael Kuncewitch / Justin Pok3-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs Sports Mall-NelsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesSimeon Thomas / Mark Follette vs Thad Smith / Rick Killpack5-7, 1-4
L#3 DoublesRick Cromar / Robert Harrington vs Jason Struletz / Christopher Call6-7, 1-2
2025-02-08vs Eccles Tennis Center-Bleak/CoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Follette / Dylan Richardson vs Jeff Peterson / Justin Allen4-6, 3-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSimeon Thomas / Hamza Qadeer vs Christopher Kyler / Spencer Hall6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEthan Lee / Charles Crowther vs Scott Jones / Paul Cutler6-1, 6-5
2025-02-01vs Liberty Park Tennis-BalchSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDylan Richardson / Paul Moxley vs Alfred Balch / Art Pinon4-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesEthan Lee / Hamza Qadeer vs David Leta / John Blanck6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-25vs Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/HazenLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Harrington / Rick Cromar vs Ben Haverkost / Scott Kitchen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Crowther / Ethan Lee vs CLARK BRIESACHER / Brandon Carter2-6, 3-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Conner Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Fernando Torres
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Dylan Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Simeon Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Hamza Qadeer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Charles Crowther
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Clark Stacey
published 3
2.58
Mark Follette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Ethan Lee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.46
Rick Cromar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Moxley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Richardson + Conner Smith7070% games+14.7% vs expected
Rick Cromar + Hamza Qadeer4547% games+6.8% vs expected
Dylan Richardson + Simeon Thomas7258% games+6.3% vs expected
Fernando Torres + Mark Follette3350% games+1.9% vs expected
Ethan Lee + Hamza Qadeer2435% games−9.0% vs expected
Paul Moxley + Hamza Qadeer1436% games−10.3% vs expected
Rick Cromar + Mark Follette2737% games−11.2% vs expected
Mark Follette + Hamza Qadeer2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Conner Smith
39W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Fernando Torres
98W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Dylan Richardson
52W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Simeon Thomas
34W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Hamza Qadeer
27W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Charles Crowther
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Clark Stacey
67W–86L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Mark Follette
69W–96L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Ethan Lee
12W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Rick Cromar
27W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Paul Moxley
10W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Harrington
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.