Teams

Team 6 - Full Metal Racquets

2021 Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over Spring · Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-23vs Team 3 - RCC Bon VivantsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Cheng / Tara Jefferson vs David Flam / Coni Schaefer6-7, 0-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Velasco / Anthony Chang vs Steve Ziff / Karen Ziff6-4, 6-3
2021-05-16vs Team 1 - High RollersLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnthony Chang / Susan Velasco vs Meredith Broome / Ronjeet Reddy1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Bouwmeester / Lenny Williams vs Manish Desai / Casey Keplinger1-6, 1-6
2021-05-09vs Team 4 - Nuts & HoneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnthony Chang / Amanda Wenzel vs Jorge Prieto Choy / Roxana Prieto Choy6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFreddy Feliz / Alison Bouwmeester vs I-Chun Lao O'Brien / Arturo Garcia Alonso7-5, 5-3
2021-05-05vs Team 2 - Creighton FarmsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Jefferson / Brian Cheng vs Nicole Leppert / Greg Schinner6-1, 6-0
2021-04-27vs Team 2 - Creighton FarmsWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Jefferson / Brian Cheng vs Tina Woods / John Jaeger6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Wenzel / Lenny Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-25vs Team 5 - Smart AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesLenny Williams / Alison Bouwmeester vs Wendy Hopkins / Eric Hopkins5-7, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Brian Cheng
published 4
3.38
Anthony Chang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Freddy Feliz
published 3.5
3.29
Susan Velasco
published
3.26
Carrie Gray
published 4
3.08
Lenny Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Alison Bouwmeester
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Tara Jefferson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Kassie Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lenny Williams + Alison Bouwmeester044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Cheng
25W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Anthony Chang
249W–160L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Freddy Feliz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
Susan Velasco
51W–22L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
4
Carrie Gray
19W–7L career · no lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Lenny Williams
68W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alison Bouwmeester
68W–115L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Tara Jefferson
185W–158L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kassie Stewart
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.