Teams

FC-Basha Tennis 2.5M

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs MI-Aces Up-ChangWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatt Papes / Van Ly vs Jeffrey Wenzel / Oliver Chang3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesUpen Kattla vs Shaz Qadeer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Fong / Todd Reifsteck vs David Vavrichek / Michael Brick7-5, 7-5
2026-02-21vs MC-2.5M-MuthuLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Fong / Van Ly vs Senthil Kumar Muthu / Forrest Yu5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatt Papes vs Suresh Siricilla4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Reifsteck / Upen Kattla vs Maruthu Karuppaiah / Kori Kolodziejczak3-6, 4-6
2026-02-20vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 03
L#1 DoublesVan Ly / John Fong vs Thomas Natsis / Michalis Chrysanthou3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTodd Reifsteck vs Jashan Parikh0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Papes / Upen Kattla vs Swamy Shivaganga Nagaraju / naresh gunde1-6, 5-7
2026-02-14vs HBSQ-RichLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuhas Pinnamaneni / Upen Kattla vs Darrel Rich / Bruce Jahnke1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Fong vs Aaron Young3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Papes / Van Ly vs Michael Kosten / Daryl Okamura6-4, 6-3
2026-02-06vs ETC-Box2 2.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesVan Ly / Matt Papes vs Omid Fatemieh / Armin Alaghi2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesUpen Kattla / Todd Reifsteck vs Thomas Resing / Venkat Mahalingam4-6, 6-7
2026-01-31vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Fong / Upen Kattla vs Louis Cheng / Harry Arsene0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSuhas Pinnamaneni / Todd Reifsteck vs Craig Gant / Michalis Chrysanthou4-6, 1-6
2026-01-24vs MI-Aces Up-ChangLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Reifsteck / Will Crafton vs Shaz Qadeer / Lee Slaughter1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesVan Ly vs Oliver Chang5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMatt Papes / Suhas Pinnamaneni vs Bryn Peterson / Robert Peha7-5, 6-4
2026-01-17vs NWW-HBSQ-RedaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Fong / Upen Kattla vs David Eckols / Richard Gould6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVan Ly vs Jorge Calugas Ii2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Papes / Todd Reifsteck vs Tom Lash / Kevin Mcdonald5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Josh Basha
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 5
2.93
Christina Vanburen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.32
Matt Papes
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.23
John Fong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.23
Upen Kattla
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.10
Todd Reifsteck
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.09
Van Ly
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Suhas Pinnamaneni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Will Crafton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Van Ly + Matt Papes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Josh Basha
123W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.64
3
Christina Vanburen
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
2.5
Matt Papes
4W–9L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
John Fong
2W–8L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Upen Kattla
4W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Todd Reifsteck
3W–9L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Van Ly
2W–12L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Suhas Pinnamaneni
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Will Crafton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.