Teams

Tie ONE On

2022 SVTA Singles Fall Women · Shenandoah 3.5 Weekday FALL Singles Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-24vs Chestnut ForksWon 10
W#1 SinglesAlison Naden vs Meagan Maynard4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-10vs Chestnut ForksWon 10
W#1 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Stephanie Kennedy6-3, 6-2
2022-09-26vs MiddleburgWon 20
W#1 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Susan Egan6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAlison Naden vs Julie Mandia7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-29vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#2 SinglesCristina Mantell vs Julie Mandia4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 3.5 Weekday FALL Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Allison Kearney
published 4
3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.70
Cristina Mantell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.32
Alison Naden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
Julie Kyle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Kearney
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Cristina Mantell
104W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Alison Naden
117W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
Julie Kyle
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.