Teams

Stan Jastrzebski

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over 3.5-4.5 Tri-Level · 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-04vs MO/Jones/3.5-4.5Tri-levelMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKamlendra Singh / Samuelle Mercado vs Blake Jones / Ryan Bell0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStan Jastrzebski / Kevin Everett vs Robert Jones / Anthony Jones3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoel McNutt / Timothy Dunville vs Dylan Geick / Marcus Maloney2-6, 0-6
2025-10-04vs MO/Jones/3.5-4.5Tri-levelMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlberto Gonzalez Lopez / Samuelle Mercado vs Ryan Bell / Matthew Murrow3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStan Jastrzebski / S Hasan Naqvi vs Robert Jones / Blake Jones3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTimothy Dunville / Joel McNutt vs Dylan Geick / Marcus Maloney1-6, 2-6
2025-10-04vs MO/Jones/3.5-4.5Tri-levelMLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlberto Gonzalez Lopez / Samuelle Mercado vs Matthew Murrow / Blake Jones3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStan Jastrzebski / S Hasan Naqvi vs Robert Jones / Anthony Jones2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTimothy Dunville / Joel McNutt vs Dylan Geick / Matthew Morris2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO/Jones/3.5-4.5Tri-levelM3081339
2Stan Jastrzebski031817106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andy McDill
published 4.5
3.15
Alberto Gonzalez Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joel McNutt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kamlendra Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Everett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
S Hasan Naqvi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samuelle Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stan Jastrzebski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Dunville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Dunville + Joel McNutt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andy McDill
15W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alberto Gonzalez Lopez
2W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Joel McNutt
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kamlendra Singh
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Everett
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
S Hasan Naqvi
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuelle Mercado
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stan Jastrzebski
13W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Dunville
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.