Teams

VDF String Queens - S. Cornell

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesKaren Devorace / Karen Wingard vs Lisa Dreisbach / Julianne Frost2-6, 3-6
2022-05-27vs Riverhills Racketeers - D. FlairWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Botet / Karen Wingard vs Judy Bailey / Denise Morgan6-2, 6-0
2022-05-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Wingard / Jackie Botet vs KIRSTEN ALVAREZ / Despina Betza6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Devorace / Raquel Pullaro vs Jennifer Easley / Vaida Kovalick6-4, 6-3
2022-05-06vs HG Top Spinners - L. MarinezWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Devorace / Karen Wingard vs Carla Chappell / Maria Ramirez6-3, 6-1
2022-04-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Dean / Raquel Pullaro vs Debra Jeakle / Valerie Casey2-6, 0-6
2022-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Devorace / Karen Wingard vs Susan Meyers / Kimberly Smail6-2, 6-2
2022-04-15vs Hills - Palma Ceia Overserved/BurdenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Devorace / Karen Wingard vs Charity Toth / Melissa Henderson6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Dean / Raquel Pullaro vs Alina Callahan / Cindy Eicholtz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Karen Wingard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.81
Michelle Barry
published
2.77
Jackie Botet
published 3
2.69
Raquel Pullaro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Ludwiga McClendon
published
2.53
Lisa Dean
published
2.40
Bridget Harrison
published 2.5
2.34
Karalee Kulek-Luzey
published
Karen Devorace
published
Rosella Nelson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Wingard
117W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Michelle Barry
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jackie Botet
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Ludwiga McClendon
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lisa Dean
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Bridget Harrison
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.40
Karalee Kulek-Luzey
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.34
Karen Devorace
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosella Nelson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.