Teams

Podesta/Memphis

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-24vs Brown/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor Long / Josie Hammons vs Kristin Dannemiller / Jared Bigler2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChad Rounder / Hattie Rounder vs Emily Brown / Grant Goforth0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBen Ricketts / Mallory Podesta vs Nicole Amaro / Daniel Forbes2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Hattie Rounder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Josie Hammons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Kate Stakem
published
3.74
3.66
Stephanie Sheahan
published
3.61
Kristen Griffith
published
3.57
Finy Shirley
published 3.5
3.56
Ben Gladstone
published 4
3.54
Michael Bradshaw
published
3.33
Taylor Lackie
published
3.29
Dusty Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ben Ricketts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
John Sheahan
published
3.06
Chad Rounder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mallory Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hattie Rounder + Chad Rounder224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Sheahan + John Sheahan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hattie Rounder
43W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Josie Hammons
44W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
Kate Stakem
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christina Edwards
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Stephanie Sheahan
19W–23L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Kristen Griffith
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Finy Shirley
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.57
4
Ben Gladstone
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Michael Bradshaw
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Taylor Lackie
31W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Dusty Nelson
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Ben Ricketts
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Sheahan
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Chad Rounder
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Mallory Podesta
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.