Teams

Hazel

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-03vs Montana/Delozier/1MX8&Over8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCamilla McCullough / Nicholas Scott vs Will Aguilar / Melissa Williams3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Hillary Wolfson / Kendall Stowe6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Collins / Ray Loomis vs Ui Afualo / JJ Fuller1-6, 1-6
2024-03-02vs Unrequited Love-40Won 30
W#1 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Amber Sparks / Gordon Terpe6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCamilla McCullough / Nicholas Scott vs Elizabeth Lund / David Dernbach6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnna Collins / Ray Loomis vs Melanie Mudge / Cary Burg6-3, 7-6
2024-03-02vs Montana/Delozier/1MX8&Over8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Laura Sumpter / Michael Delozier6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Jackson / Ray Loomis vs JJ Fuller / Ui Afualo2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Collins / James Shaffer vs Hillary Wolfson / Kendall Stowe3-6, 2-6
2024-03-01vs Unrequited Love-40Won 30
W#1 DoublesCamilla McCullough / Nicholas Scott vs Amber Sparks / Gordon Terpe6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHazel Demaray / Ryan Schreiber vs Andrea Hier / Brian Metzger6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Jackson / Ray Loomis vs Joanne Sposito / Robert Brooks6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Nicholas Scott
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 5
3.69
Ryan Schreiber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Anna Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ann Jackson
published 3.5
3.21
Camilla McCullough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
James Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Hazel Demaray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Ray Loomis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hazel Demaray + Ryan Schreiber10170% gamesnot enough data
Anna Collins + Ray Loomis5544% gamesnot enough data
Nicholas Scott + Camilla McCullough303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Nicholas Scott
42W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
4.59
4
Ryan Schreiber
14W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Anna Collins
20W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Ann Jackson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Camilla McCullough
5W–11L career · type T · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
James Shaffer
47W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
0
Hazel Demaray
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Loomis
13W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.