Teams

OC LLW Coto De Caza - Kristina

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-24vs OC Lifetime RSC - JeanetteLost 01
L#1 DoublesLissett MacHado / Pam Schuler vs Jeanette Delaney / Sue Michailidis3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-11-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Schuler / Irene Suber vs Anne Cilani / Anita Atapattu6-1, 6-4
2023-10-13vs OC Marbella CC - StephWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Schuler / Sara Scarbo vs Briana Bellini / Amy Staley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-15vs OC The Huntington Club - NatalieWon 10
W#3 DoublesPam Schuler / Cecilia Praino vs Audrey Hartman / Nicole Kelso6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Sara Scarbo
published 3.5
3.31
Dana Orsini
published 3.5
3.31
Fiorella Villar
published
3.22
Madona Shaheen
published
3.16
Tomoe Stevens
published
3.13
Pam Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Patty Rydelski
published
3.09
Lissett MacHado
published
3.07
Sarah Cieslik
published
3.06
Nicole Miranda
published
3.01
Lynda Sims
published
2.98
Sherry Harley
published
2.96
Emily Moradi
published
2.90
Kristina Hellinga
published
Allison Mandel
published 3
Irene Suber
published
Maritza Bernard
published
Theresa Alley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Miranda + Pam Schuler2439% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Lynda Sims314 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Nicole Miranda213 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Sims + Pam Schuler123 matchesnot enough data
Pam Schuler + Sara Scarbo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sara Scarbo
31W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
Fiorella Villar
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Madona Shaheen
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Tomoe Stevens
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Lissett MacHado
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sarah Cieslik
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Nicole Miranda
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lynda Sims
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Sherry Harley
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Emily Moradi
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kristina Hellinga
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Allison Mandel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Irene Suber
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maritza Bernard
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Alley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.