Teams

RCCB-Barto

2021 Brevard Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-21Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Small / Sandra Edwards vs Beatriz Cueto / Michele Mobley7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarbara Burgess / Carol Whalen vs Dottie Sorrick / Jacque Crawford4-6, 6-7
2021-03-14vs Brevard - RCCB / SorrickLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Barto / Barbara Burgess vs Beverly Gibbs / Teresa Blair2-6, 4-6
2021-03-07vs Brevard - RCCB / SorrickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandra Edwards / Patty Sellers vs Nancy Aumuller / Jacque Crawford2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanis Mena / Phyllis O'Toole vs Mary Jane Binney / Beverly Gibbs6-3, 6-2
2021-02-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatty Sellers / Phyllis O'Toole vs Susan Hall / Nancy Aumuller3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Janis Mena vs Susan Salter / Jacque Crawford1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-02-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Edwards / Christine Small vs Susan Hall / Michele Mobley3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Burgess / Anne Barto vs Beatriz Cueto / Dottie Sorrick2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-14vs Brevard - RCCB / SorrickLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Lee / Janis Mena vs Susan Hall / Teresa Blair2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Whalen / Barbara Burgess vs Mary Jane Binney / Jennifer Crider6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatty Sellers / Christine Small vs Jacque Crawford / Susan Salter1-6, 4-6
2021-02-07vs Brevard - RCCB / SorrickLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Edwards / Patty Sellers vs Teresa Blair / Susan Hall3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Small / Phyllis O'Toole vs Jennifer Crider / Dottie Sorrick5-7, 2-6
2021-01-31Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Lee / Janis Mena vs Mary Jane Binney / Jennifer Crider2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Burgess / Anne Barto vs Susan Salter / Jacque Crawford2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Barbara Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
3.06
Janis Mena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Patty Sellers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Karen Lee
published
Anne Barto
published 3
2.44
Christine Small
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Burgess
38W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Janis Mena
73W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.06
Patty Sellers
49W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Karen Lee
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Anne Barto
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Christine Small
76W–122L career · 4 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.