Teams

Young/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-23vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 13
L#1 DoublesSuzan House / Amy Weathers vs Neeve Owen / Kelly Roberts0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Hammargren vs Laura Ketcham1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFelice Hadden / Lara Poulos vs Jenni Johnson / Courtney Brunetz4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnthea Young / Lucynda Cynda Holmes vs McKellar Newsom / Beverly Geismar1-0
2026-05-15vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hammargren / Lucynda Cynda Holmes vs Joni Wolfe / Julie Briggs3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarialice Hatch / Suzan House vs Jill Joyce / Courtney Brunetz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-10vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesFelice Hadden / Anthea Young vs Roxie Trovato / Jenni Johnson7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLara Poulos / Tara Biondolillo vs Kennisha Cann / Joni Wolfe2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLINDA van der MERWE / Lucynda Cynda Holmes vs Stacy Sorrow / Kelly Roberts1-6, 1-6
2026-04-08vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 13
L#1 DoublesTara Biondolillo / Lorraine Marks vs Melee Gautreau / Kennisha Cann4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSuzan House vs Joni Wolfe3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnthea Young / Amy Weathers vs Roxie Trovato / Julie Briggs6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarialice Hatch / Jennifer Hammargren vs Lawanna Chang / Jill Joyce3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-21vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnthea Young / Sarah Delay vs Stacy Sorrow / Lawanna Chang4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzan House / Lorraine Marks vs Roxie Trovato / Courtney Brunetz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarialice Hatch / Jennifer Hammargren vs Laura Ketcham / Melee Gautreau4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sarah Delay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Felice Hadden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Suzan House
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Jennifer Hammargren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Tara Biondolillo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Amy Weathers
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Lorraine Marks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Marialice Hatch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Lara Poulos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Anthea Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
LINDA van der MERWE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Jane Dominick
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Delay
41W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Felice Hadden
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Suzan House
23W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jennifer Hammargren
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
Tara Biondolillo
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Amy Weathers
43W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
23W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lorraine Marks
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Marialice Hatch
25W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Lara Poulos
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Anthea Young
5W–9L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
LINDA van der MERWE
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Jane Dominick
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.