Teams

Sports Club of Las Colinas/Wood-Jolliffe W3.5

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-17vs Lakes/Fain W3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLora Thomas / Jennifer Davis vs Ryane Criswell / Brenda Bingham7-6, 6-4
2023-02-10vs High Point/Cavey W3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnne Givens / Jennifer Davis vs Mary Cavey / Anne Savino6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrisha Jolliffe / Jennifer Davis vs Tricia Roos / Tina Kimbell6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Laurie Spicer
published
3.63
August Wood
published 4
3.56
Trisha Jolliffe
published
3.52
Heather Perkins
published 3.5
3.51
3.51
Chasti Gest
published 3.5
3.45
Denelle Alexander
published 3.5
3.39
Anne Givens
published 3.5
3.38
Aimee Rodriguez
published 3.5
3.35
Rachel Stoll
published
3.30
Clare Holbrook
published 3.5
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Vicki Rose
published
3.18
Lora Thomas
published
3.16
Carolyn Strickfaden
published 3.5
Paula Reichenstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

August Wood + Laurie Spicer16954% games+8.8% vs expected
Heather Perkins + Blaine Eschenburg2450% games+7.2% vs expected
August Wood + Chasti Gest16363% games+2.3% vs expected
Chasti Gest + Anne Givens13559% games+2.2% vs expected
Blaine Eschenburg + Denelle Alexander19856% games−2.6% vs expected
Denelle Alexander + Rachel Stoll3259% gamesnot enough data
Heather Perkins + Denelle Alexander213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Perkins + Chasti Gest213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Spicer
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
August Wood
45W–27L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Trisha Jolliffe
55W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Heather Perkins
33W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
4
Blaine Eschenburg
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Chasti Gest
49W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Denelle Alexander
35W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Anne Givens
39W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Aimee Rodriguez
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Rachel Stoll
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Clare Holbrook
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jennifer Davis
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki Rose
19W–30L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Lora Thomas
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carolyn Strickfaden
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Paula Reichenstein
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.