Teams

SBible-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-17vs SNarayan-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSrinivas Govindaraju / Uday Parikh vs James Easthom / Kyle Couch3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStewart Bible vs Scott Benson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarlos Guerra / Edward Anderson vs Matt Piland / John Pelphrey6-4, 7-6
2025-04-06vs SNarayan-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Craig Radley vs David Slack / Eric Labow6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-30vs SNarayan-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesAbhi Bhirud / Richard McClenny vs Boyd Blackburn / David Slack7-5, 6-2
2025-03-23vs SNarayan-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Blake Hutchinson vs Erik J Erikson / John Pelphrey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs SNarayan-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Edmund Malesky vs Carl Rist / John Pelphrey6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Richard McClenny
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
4.25
Gaurav Luther
published
4.17
Uday Parikh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Carlos Guerra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Stewart Bible
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.06
Edmund Malesky
published
4.02
Dan Clemson
published 4.5
3.94
Rod Snyder
published
3.93
Srinivas Govindaraju
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Craig Radley
published 4
3.87
Abhi Bhirud
published 4.5
3.78
Edward Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dan Park
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Richard McClenny
429W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
Uday Parikh
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Carlos Guerra
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.12
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.11
Edmund Malesky
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
4.06
4.5
Dan Clemson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
Rod Snyder
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Srinivas Govindaraju
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
4
Craig Radley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4.5
Abhi Bhirud
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
Edward Anderson
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dan Park
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.