Teams

Cargle

2026 CVTA USTA Mixed 18 & Over - Summer · 4.5

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-20vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCody Carr / Ryleigh Lanham vs Victoria Calvert / Matthew Smith7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacob Summerville / Sarah Cargle vs Dave Dawson / Haley Henderson6-3, 7-5
2026-05-20vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLogan Yerbey / Ryleigh Lanham vs John David Cunningham / Victoria Calvert6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Cargle / Jacob Summerville vs Haley Henderson / Dave Dawson6-3, 7-5
2026-05-05vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJacob Summerville / Allison Harrison vs Dave Dawson / Haley Henderson6-4, 7-5
2026-04-28vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyleigh Lanham / John Rogers vs Gina Salisbury / Brad Wheatcroft6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLogan Yerbey / Allison Harrison vs Haley Henderson / John David Cunningham6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Cargle / Cody Carr vs Dave Dawson / Victoria Calvert6-1, 6-1
2026-04-21vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCalli Davis / Cody Carr vs Victoria Calvert / John David Cunningham6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Summerville / Jennifer Martin vs Matthew Smith / Gina Salisbury6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Cargle / Logan Yerbey vs Dave Dawson / Haley Henderson6-1, 6-1
2026-04-15vs CVTA/Dave DawsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Rogers / Allison Harrison vs John David Cunningham / Victoria Calvert6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyleigh Lanham / Cody Carr vs Dave Dawson / Haley Henderson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cargle60171377
2CVTA/Dave Dawson0611735217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Ryleigh Lanham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.11
Logan Yerbey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Allison Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Cody Carr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.73
Calli Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jacob Summerville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryleigh Lanham
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Logan Yerbey
21W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
4.11
4.5
Allison Harrison
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Cody Carr
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.89
4
Calli Davis
46W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Jacob Summerville
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.