Teams

Rossi Combo 2.5 18 2025

2025 Decatur Southern Combo 18 and Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.57 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
2.46
Erika Huber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Kathy Roeske
published
2.37
Debra Harvel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.26
Gracie Nichols
published 2.5
2.26
Cathleen Rupp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.20
Angie Cushing
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
1.98
Belinda Rossi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.96
Serena Neely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Marianne Ashe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.63
Laura Callahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Roeske + Cathleen Rupp224 matchesnot enough data
Erika Huber + Angie Cushing134 matchesnot enough data
Angie Cushing + Belinda Rossi224 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Rossi + Gracie Nichols224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Roeske + Debra Harvel213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Roeske + Serena Neely033 matchesnot enough data
Erika Huber + Belinda Rossi033 matchesnot enough data
Debra Harvel + Angie Cushing303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Caprio-smith
36W–72L career · type A · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Erika Huber
22W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
Kathy Roeske
28W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Debra Harvel
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Gracie Nichols
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Cathleen Rupp
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Angie Cushing
17W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Belinda Rossi
9W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Serena Neely
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Marianne Ashe
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Laura Callahan
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.