Teams

YMCA Cochran

2026 OH OV Mixed 18&O Charleston · 2026 MXD 18&O 6.0 Charleston

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-16vs YMCA SweckerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDustin Bach / Joan Waugh vs Crystal Bastin / Brandon Steele3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHannah Schoolfield / Gary Davis vs Casey Robinson / Susan Jarvis6-3, 6-4
2026-08-05vs YMCA SweckerLost 12
W#1 DoublesDustin Bach / Joan Waugh vs Crystal Bastin / JL Swecker6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Hussell / Edward Tiffey vs Josh Swecker / Kimberly Morris7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Sutphin / Steve Melton vs Marjorie Swecker / Dana Eddy0-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs YMCA SweckerWon 20
W#1 DoublesDustin Bach / Joan Waugh vs Crystal Bastin / Dana Eddy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdward Tiffey / Catherine Cross vs Susan Jarvis / JL Swecker6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25vs YMCA SweckerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDustin Bach / Joan Waugh vs Brandon Steele / Marjorie Swecker6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHannah Schoolfield / Gary Davis vs Susan Jarvis / JL Swecker4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Melton / Shelly Hussell vs Crystal Bastin / Dana Eddy5-7, 4-6
2026-06-13vs YMCA SweckerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Sutphin / L Cochran vs Marjorie Swecker / Brandon Steele0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDustin Bach / Catherine Cross vs Kimberly Morris / Josh Swecker6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHannah Schoolfield / Gary Davis vs JL Swecker / Susan Jarvis7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 MXD 18&O 6.0 Charleston
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YMCA Cochran419614121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Hannah Schoolfield
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Joan Waugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
L Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Dustin Bach
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.84
Edward Tiffey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Steve Melton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Sutphin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shelly Hussell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Waugh + Dustin Bach5162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Schoolfield
35W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Joan Waugh
84W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
L Cochran
64W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Dustin Bach
26W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Edward Tiffey
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Steve Melton
23W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
Lauren Sutphin
41W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelly Hussell
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.