Teams

SStover (Southampton)

2022 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-11vs MFigard (Mathews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Link / Julia Payne vs Sally Lowrance / Suzanne Roxburgh2-6, 5-7
2022-04-04vs GMurrell/Guinn (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Link / Denise Bost vs Sally Wrenn / Kay Dugan7-5, 6-3
2022-03-21vs KTodd (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesW Kay Bridges / Valerie Link vs Faye Childress / Karen Sterrett6-2, 6-3
2022-03-14vs CHobson (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Link / Denise Bost vs Barbara Northrup / Sally Dickson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-03-07vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#1 DoublesW Kay Bridges / Valerie Link vs Linda Bollag / Sharon Surrett6-4, 7-5
2022-02-28vs PKahle (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Gould / Valerie Link vs Wilma Pinter / Patty Kahle5-7, 0-6
2022-02-14vs GMurrell/Guinn (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Link / Denise Bost vs Carol Guinn / Kathryn Shomo6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Denise Bost
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
W Kay Bridges
published
3.06
Julia Payne
published
3.01
Valerie Link
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Cindy Wilson
published 3
2.90
Nancy Christensen
published
2.71
Susie McCraney
published
2.57
Janet Janda
published
Pat Rudisill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

W Kay Bridges + Cindy Wilson5257% games−2.2% vs expected
Denise Bost + Valerie Link10654% games−5.2% vs expected
W Kay Bridges + Julia Payne303 matchesnot enough data
Julia Payne + Nancy Christensen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Bost
206W–139L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
W Kay Bridges
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Julia Payne
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Valerie Link
83W–97L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Cindy Wilson
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
Nancy Christensen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Susie McCraney
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Janet Janda
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Pat Rudisill
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.