← Teams

SAC-Nash/Yu

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Juan Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Kristin Spear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.08
Jennifer Benedict
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.02
Sydney Taggart
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.98
Tamara Justus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.80
Coral Nash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.79
Honghui Liang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Bo Yu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
Results6 ties
2024-06-08Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesTamara Justus / Juan Li vs Amy Bucher / Mary Bullard7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSydney Taggart vs Mary Green-Zwemke1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Kristin Spear vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Denielle Edlund6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJill Sather / Bo Yu vs Shannon Roarke / Sierra Wright6-3, 7-6
2024-06-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesSandra Barnes / Tamara Justus vs Alix Edwards / Amanda Solomon6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCoral Nash vs Vickie Maletteri6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJuan Li / Honghui Liang vs Tracey Riddle / Kim Hill6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBo Yu / Molly Shum vs Karen Sullivan / Anne McCroskey6-3, 6-2
2024-05-19Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesHonghui Liang / Juan Li vs Bronwen Hager / Janelle Laurila6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSydney Taggart vs Libby North5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Kristin Spear vs Carrie Engle / Corinne Celko6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Sather / Jenna Hayes vs Trish Vawter / Timora Konigwilcox2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Juan Li vs Yen Ly / Cathrine Olander5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCoral Nash / Jenna Hayes vs Kerstin Anderson / Kirsten Barnes6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSydney Taggart / Honghui Liang vs Cindy Nordlund / Emily Townsend6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSydney Taggart / Honghui Liang vs Angie Morey / Trina Denson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTamara Justus / Juan Li vs Amy Graham / Monique Eldridge6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCoral Nash / Jill Sather vs Krista Mikalatos / Minou Chau6-1, 6-3
2024-04-14Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesSandra Barnes / Honghui Liang vs Shannon Bilstrom / Annie Duong6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTamara Justus vs Loann Wong6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJuan Li / Sydney Taggart vs Mariniah Prendergast / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCoral Nash / Jennifer Benedict vs Lisa Handley / Heidi Clark2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Juan Li
117W–72L career
1%98%1%
4.21
4.5
Kristin Spear
110W–39L career
3%97%0%
4.12
4.5
Jennifer Benedict
89W–51L career
6%94%0%
4.08
4.5
Sydney Taggart
68W–105L career
24%75%1%
4.02
4.5
Tamara Justus
98W–68L career
19%81%0%
3.98
4.5
Coral Nash
39W–69L career
67%33%0%
3.80
4.5
Honghui Liang
61W–84L career
70%30%0%
3.79
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Bo Yu
105W–180L career
4%96%0%
3.65

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.