← Teams

PTC-Traylen/Bowie

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.31 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Katherine McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Joe Malboeuf
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Teufelin Traylen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Jessica Dalpiaz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Kimbra Kasch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Brian Craighill
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Lars Kasch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Elliott Gansner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2021-12-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs Sev Flores / Debbie Spitzer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoe Malboeuf / Tiffany Bowie vs Masafumi Inoue / Wanda Ng6-1, 6-4
2021-11-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs Heidi Palena / Robert Palena6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIlona Vondolovski / Elliott Gansner vs Steven Darling / Teresa Darling4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Craighill / Jessica Dalpiaz vs Julie Gorretta / Damir Lemes7-6, 6-1
2021-11-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKatherine McMillan / Lars Kasch vs Jennifer Potter / Scott Dickinson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Brian Craighill vs Whitney Mam / Skip Potter7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Michael Jakola vs Yanchen Qi / Jonathan Guinn6-4, 6-1
2021-11-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Lars Kasch vs Minnie Bautista / Ralph Doctor6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoe Malboeuf / Katherine McMillan vs Brandon Coston / Julia Daigneault6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Craighill / Jessica Dalpiaz vs Alireza Bayestehtashk / Alice Phillips3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-31Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Joe Malboeuf vs Kate Quisling / William Seidl4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElliott Gansner / Ilona Vondolovski vs Scott Naugler / Laurel Hallock Koppelman7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Jakola / Teufelin Traylen vs Mark Alan / Sarie Crothers6-3, 6-0
2021-10-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKatherine McMillan / Elliott Gansner vs Anne Hamburg / Dan Bingham7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Dalpiaz / Brian Craighill vs Maria Kimberling / Dan Tracy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs Robert Glenn / Carol Glenn6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoe Malboeuf / Tiffany Bowie vs PATRICK GOTTSCH / Wendi Ouellette6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrian Craighill / Jessica Dalpiaz vs Erik Bucher / Victoria Walton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesElliott Gansner / Katherine McMillan vs Dorothy Cofield / Michael Sullivan6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJoe Malboeuf / Tiffany Bowie vs Julian Pscheid / Laurel Soot6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Jakola / Teufelin Traylen vs Deana Julka / Scott Soot6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tiffany Bowie
95W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Katherine McMillan
49W–14L career
1%90%9%
3.36
3.5
Joe Malboeuf
62W–50L career
3%97%0%
3.20
3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
14%86%0%
3.08
3.5
Jessica Dalpiaz
18W–18L career
28%72%0%
3.06
3
Kimbra Kasch
40W–45L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Brian Craighill
10W–16L career · type S
0%96%3%
2.83
3
Lars Kasch
32W–61L career
2%96%2%
2.77
0
Elliott Gansner
15W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.