Teams

STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0M

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring · Men 5.0

9 players · average NTRP 5.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-21vs Lesko (S)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAustin Diehl / Mario Gruden vs Angelo Vidal / David Perez3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRob White vs Michael Lesko6-1, 6-2
2024-05-14vs Lesko (S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRob White / Karl Heinrichs vs Michael Lesko / Matthew Bier3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPatrick Huewe vs David Perez3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Clayton / Steve Moehn vs Benjamin Cobin / Angelo Vidal6-4, 6-4
2024-04-30vs Lesko (S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKarl Heinrichs / Oscar Pachon vs Michael Levan / Franklin Zhong6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRob White vs Pedro Pablo Araujo6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Huewe / Christopher Clayton vs Benjamin Cobin / Angelo Vidal0-6, 5-7
2024-04-16vs Lesko (S)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRob White / Mario Gruden vs Riley Muren / David Perez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOscar Pachon vs Michael Lesko6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Clayton / Steve Moehn vs Angelo Vidal / Clayton Maack1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-09vs Lesko (S)Won 30
W#1 DoublesOscar Pachon / Austin Diehl vs Riley Muren / David Perez6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRob White vs Clayton Maack6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristopher Clayton / Mcafee Burke vs Franklin Zhong / Angelo Vidal4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-02vs Lesko (S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRob White / Karl Heinrichs vs Michael Lesko / Riley Muren7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAustin Diehl vs Pedro Pablo Araujo6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMcafee Burke / Steve Moehn vs Franklin Zhong / Benjamin Cobin6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/White-Burke/18&Over5.0M6014413137
2Lesko (S)0641429192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Mcafee Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.68
Christopher Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.66
Oscar Pachon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.60
Austin Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.49
Rob White
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.33
Mario Gruden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Patrick Huewe
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.25
Steve Moehn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karl Heinrichs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mcafee Burke + Rob White303 matchesnot enough data
Mcafee Burke + Steve Moehn123 matchesnot enough data
Rob White + Steve Moehn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mcafee Burke
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Christopher Clayton
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.68
Oscar Pachon
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.66
5
Austin Diehl
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
Rob White
44W–2L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.49
Mario Gruden
36W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.33
Patrick Huewe
18W–10L career · 12 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Steve Moehn
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
4.25
Karl Heinrichs
13W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.