Teams

RBW-Dodd

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-08vs MC-Tigers-SatoLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Faloon / Dan Jordt vs Alvin Sato / Scott Watson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2020-10-24vs AYTC (OUTDOORS) PatzWon 20
W#2 DoublesChuck Burns / Tim Lyon vs Paul Costello / Bill Patz6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Dodd / Rodney Rowen vs Steve Hirsch / Matthew McCormick6-4, 6-3
2020-10-17vs TCSP-The Longshots-KothaLost 01
L#3 DoublesRodney Rowen / Tee Yokobe vs Matthew Metz / Douglas Pearson2-6, 0-6
2020-10-04vs CP-Lords-PaulsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Cissell / Richard Ross vs Douglas Morrison / Tod Wescott2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Dodd / Rodney Rowen vs John Iwanski / Steve Oroszlan1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChuck Burns / Steve Faloon vs Jack Fredrickson / Thomas Lynch7-6, 6-4
2020-09-20vs HBSQ-Wharf Rats 55-StrongSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteve Cissell / Terry Dodd vs STEPHEN WAUGH / Dean Strong3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTee Yokobe / Steve Faloon vs Jackson Simmons / Mark Henninger6-7, 5-3
2020-09-05vs WSC-Full Metal Rackets-HummerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTim Lyon / Chuck Burns vs Phil O'Brien / Steven Bishop6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerry Dodd / Tee Yokobe vs Mike Gilkey / Jim Rutledge1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Steve Faloon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
Mihai Petriuc
published
2.92
Terry Dodd
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.90
Rodney Rowen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Tee Yokobe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chuck Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Steve Cissell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Dodd + Steve Cissell5450% gamesnot enough data
Terry Dodd + Steve Faloon6256% gamesnot enough data
Chuck Burns + Steve Faloon1439% gamesnot enough data
Rodney Rowen + Chuck Burns224 matchesnot enough data
Terry Dodd + Chuck Burns134 matchesnot enough data
Steve Cissell + Steve Faloon134 matchesnot enough data
Rodney Rowen + Terry Dodd213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Faloon
65W–31L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mihai Petriuc
72W–76L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Terry Dodd
79W–58L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Rodney Rowen
25W–64L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Tee Yokobe
74W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Chuck Burns
18W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Steve Cissell
78W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.